The interactive effects of irrigation, sowing date and nitrogen on water status, protein and yield of pea (Pisum sativum L.)

  • Ashraf, MI, Pervez, MA, Amjad, M., Ahmad, R. & Ayub, M. Qualitative and quantitative response of pea (Pisum sativa L.) to judicious applications of irrigation with phosphorus and potassium. Pack. J.Life Soc. Science. 9(2), 159-164 (2011).

    Google Scholar

  • Peksen, E., Peksen, A., Bozoglu, H. & Gülümser, A. Comparison of fresh pod yield and pod-related characteristics in pea (Pisum sativa L.) cultivars sown in autumn and spring under Samsun ecological conditions. Turkish. J. Agric. For. 28(5), 363–370 (2004).

    Google Scholar

  • Ayyub, CM, Ziaf, K., Pervez, MA, Rasheed, MAS, and Akhtar, N. Effect of seed maturity and storability on pea viability and vigor (Pisum sativum L.) seeds, in Proceedings of the International Horticulture Industry Outlook Symposium in Pakistan organized by the Institute of Horticultural Sciences. University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (28-30 March) (2007).

  • Nonnecke, IL Vegetable production (Springer, 1989).

    Google Scholar

  • Urbano, G. et al. Nutritional Rating of Pea (Pisum sativa L.) protein diets after mild hydrothermal treatment and with and without added phytase. J. Agric. Food chemistry. 51(8), 2415–2420 (2003).

    CASE
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Analysis Esho, KB, Al-Kumar, MK & Jubrael, JM Diallel using the Hayman method to study yield genetic architecture and its component in peas (Pisum sativa L.). Diyala J. Agric. Science. 6(1), 76–88 (2014).

    Google Scholar

  • Johnston, AM et al. Management of field pea seedlings. Box. J. Factory Sci. 82(4), 639–644 (2002).

    Google Scholar

  • Voisin, AS, Salon, C., Munier-Jolain, NG & Ney, B. Quantitative effects of soil nitrate, growth potential and phenology on symbiotic nitrogen fixation of pea (Pisum sativa L.). plant soil 243(1), 31-42 (2002).

    CASE

    Google Scholar

  • Duzdemir, O., Kurunc, AHMET & Unlukara, A. Pea response (Pisum sativa) salinity and irrigation water regime. Bulg. J. Agric. Science. 15(5), 400–409 (2009).

    Google Scholar

  • Rasaei, A., Ghobadi, ME & Ghobadi, M. Effect of supplemental irrigation and plant density on yield and yield components of peas (Pisum sativa L.) in the Kermanshah region. Afr. J. Agric. Res. seven(15), 2353–2358 (2012).

    Google Scholar

  • Tilman, D., Cassman, KG, Matson, PA, Naylor, R. & Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418(6898), 671–677 (2002).

    ADS
    CASE
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Subhan, F. Effect of timing of nitrogen application on pea growth and yield. Bulletin Penelitian Hortikultura
    1791–95 (1991).

    Google Scholar

  • Mehrabi, F. & Sepaskhah, AR Interaction effects of planting method, irrigation regimes, and nitrogen application rates on yield, water use efficiency, and soil winter wheat nitrogen (Triticum aestivum). Int. J.Plant Prod. 12265-283 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • McKenzie, RH, Middleton, AB, Flore, N. & Bremer, E. Evapotranspiration efficiency of pea in southern and central Alberta. Box. J. Factory Sci. 84(2), 473–476 (2004).

    Google Scholar

  • Faligowska, A. et al. Nitrogen fixation and pea yield in different tillage systems. Agronomy J. 12(352), 1–13 (2022).

    Google Scholar

  • H or F. et al. Low-N fertilizer application and intercropping increase the N concentration in pea (Pisum sativa L.) Cereals. Front. Factory Sci. 9(1763), 1–14 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Soltani, A. Agricultural production. Lecture notes (Gorgan University of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, Iran, 2009).

  • Rodriguez-Lizana, A., Carbonell, R., Gonzalez, P. & Ordonez, R. N, P, and K released by field decomposition of residues from a pea-wheat-sunflower rotation. Nutr. cycle Agroecosystem. 87(2), 199-208 (2010).

    CASE

    Google Scholar

  • Adamsen, FJ & Coffelt, TA Effects of planting date on flowering, seed yield, and oil content of rapeseed and crambe cultivars. Ind. Cultures Prod. 21(3), 293–307 (2005).

    Google Scholar

  • Singh, N., Kaur, N., Rana, JC & Sharma, SK Diversity of properties of field pea seeds and flour (Pisum sativum) genetic material. Food chemistry. 122(3), 518-525 (2010).

    CASE

    Google Scholar

  • Ahmad, B. et al. Influence of sowing date on field pea growth and yield (Pisum sativa L.) genotypes. Asian res. J. Agric. 13(2), 26–34 (2020).

    Google Scholar

  • Ishtiaq, M., Ara, N. & Rashid, A. Response of different pea cultivars at various planting dates under Swat agro-climatic conditions [Pakistan]. Sarhad J. Agric. 8(3), 231–245 (2001).

    Google Scholar

  • Kirk, PL Kjeldahl method for total nitrogen. Anal. Chem. 22(2), 354–358 (1950).

    CASE

    Google Scholar

  • Ezeagu, IE, Petzke, JK, Metges, CC, Akinsoyinu, AO & Ologhobo, AD Seed protein content and nitrogen-protein conversion factors for selected seeds of non-crop tropical plants. Food chemistry. 78(1), 105-109 (2002).

    CASE

    Google Scholar

  • SAS Institute Inc. SAS/ACCESS® 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, 2013).

  • Cakmak, O. et al. Tolerance of 65 durum wheat genotypes to zinc deficiency in calcareous soil. J. Plant Nutr. 24(11), 1831–1847 (2001).

    CASE

    Google Scholar

  • Alessi, J., Power, JF & Zimmerman, DC Effects of seeding date and population on water use efficiency and safflower yield. Agro. J 73(5), 783–787 (1981).

    Google Scholar

  • Sarawat, P., Stoddard, FL, Marshall, DR & Ali, SM Heterosis for yield and associated traits in pea. Euphytic 80(1), 39–48 (1994).

    Google Scholar

  • Maleki, A., Heidari, A., Siadat, A., Tahmasebi, A. & Fathi, A. Effect of supplemental irrigation on yield, yield components and protein percentages of chickpea cultivars in Ilam , Iran. J. Crop Ecophysiol. 19(5), 65–78 (2011) (in Persian).

    Google Scholar

  • Hosseini, NM, Palta, JA, Berger, JD & Siddique, KHM Sowing the effects of soil water content on chickpea (Cicer arianetin L.): seedling emergence and interaction of early growth with genotype and seed size. Agric. Water Management 96(12), 1732–1736 (2009).

    Google Scholar

  • Leng, G., Zhang, X., Huang, M., Asrar, GR & Leung, LR The role of climatic covariability on crop yields in the contiguous United States. Science. representing 6(1), 1–11 (2016).

    Google Scholar

  • Shabiri, S., Ghasemi Golazani, K., Golchin, A. & Saba, J. Effect of water deficit on phenology and yield of three chickpea cultivars (Cicer arianetin L.). J. Agric. To know. 16(2), 137–147 (2006) (in Persian).

    Google Scholar

  • Al-Barrak, KM Effects of irrigation interval and nitrogen level on canola growth and yield (brassica napus L.). Science. J. King Faisal University. seven(1), 87-102 (2006).

    Google Scholar

  • Krga, I. et al. Biomass and protein yields of forage pea and oat intercrops affected by seeding standards and nitrogen fertilizer at two different growth stages. Agriculture 11(9), 871 (2021).

    CASE

    Google Scholar

  • Achakzai, AKK & Bangulzai, MI Effect of various nitrogen fertilizer levels on pea yield and yield attributes (Pisum sativa L.). Pack. J.Bot. 38(2), 331 (2006).

    Google Scholar

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Global variation of soil transpiration and evaporation and the role of their main climatic factors. J. Geophys. Res. atmosphere. 122(13), 6868–6881 (2017).

    ADS

    Google Scholar

  • Shih, SF Data requirements for estimating evapotranspiration. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 110(3), 263–274 (1984).

    Google Scholar

  • About Alma Ackerman

    Check Also

    Winning numbers drawn in the game ‘Mega Millions’ | State

    Country the United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsU.S. Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth …