Law360 (Jan. 12, 2021, 6:32 p.m. EST) – The Third Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday overturned the convictions of four former Wilmington Trust Corp. executives, ruling that prosecutors had failed to prove the bank had failed not reporting loans with an extension as “past due” during the 2007-08 financial crisis violated the only reasonable interpretation of federal regulations.
The three-judge panel said that when a regulation is ambiguous, the onus is on the government to prove that a defendant knowingly made false statements, either under a reasonable interpretation of that regulation alone or under all of them. reasonable interpretations possible.
As a result, the panel said the government had failed to prove its case against the former president of Wilmington …
Stay one step ahead
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You need to know what’s going on with customers, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to stay an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data in articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of prosecution, etc.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, requests, etc.
Create personalized alerts for specific case articles and topics and more!